Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 439, 2022 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275028

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are considered the path out of the COVID-19 pandemic. The government of Kenya is implementing a phased strategy to vaccinate the Kenyan population, initially targeting populations at high risk of severe disease and infection. We estimated the financial and economic unit costs of procuring and delivering the COVID-19 vaccine in Kenya across various vaccination strategies. METHODS: We used an activity-based costing approach to estimate the incremental costs of COVID-19 vaccine delivery, from a health systems perspective. Document reviews and key informant interviews(n = 12) were done to inform the activities, assumptions and the resources required. Unit prices were derived from document reviews or from market prices. Both financial and economic vaccine procurement costs per person vaccinated with 2-doses, and the vaccine delivery costs per person vaccinated with 2-doses were estimated and reported in 2021USD. RESULTS: The financial costs of vaccine procurement per person vaccinated with 2-doses ranged from $2.89-$13.09 in the 30% and 100% coverage levels respectively, however, the economic cost was $17.34 across all strategies. Financial vaccine delivery costs per person vaccinated with 2-doses, ranged from $4.28-$3.29 in the 30% and 100% coverage strategies: While the economic delivery costs were two to three times higher than the financial costs. The total procurement and delivery costs per person vaccinated with 2-doses ranged from $7.34-$16.47 for the financial costs and $29.7-$24.68 for the economic costs for the 30% and 100% coverage respectively. With the exception of procurement costs, the main cost driver of financial and economic delivery costs was supply chain costs (47-59%) and advocacy, communication and social mobilization (29-35%) respectively. CONCLUSION: This analysis presents cost estimates that can be used to inform local policy and may further inform parameters used in cost-effectiveness models. The results could potentially be adapted and adjusted to country-specific assumptions to enhance applicability in similar low-and middle-income settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Immunization Programs , Kenya/epidemiology , Pandemics
2.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(4)2023 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2242876

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there has been a decrease in the supervision of the medication of subjects with chronic diseases. Customized automated dosing systems (SPDA) are devices that allow medication to be dispensed and administered, which have proven to be safe and effective for the patient and cost-effective for the healthcare system. METHODS: an intervention study was carried out on patients from January to December 2019 in a residential centre for the elderly with more than 100 beds. The economic costs derived from manual dosing were compared with those of an automated preparation (Robotik Technology®). RESULTS: Of the 198 patients included, 195 (97.47%) of them were polymedicated. Of the total of 276 active substances of registered medicinal products, it was possible to include them in the process of automating the preparation of the SPDA 105 active pharmaceutical ingredients. A cost reduction of EUR 5062.39 per year was found using SPDA. Taking into account the active ingredients of emblistable and non-emblistable medicines, the use of SPDA resulted in savings of EUR 6120.40 per year. The system contributed to the detection of cases of therapeutic duplication and reduced the time to prepare the medication. CONCLUSIONS: the use of SPDA is a useful and economically profitable strategy for its use in residential centres for the elderly.

3.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm ; 3: 100047, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1300981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 testing strategies and determining the accuracy of tests is crucial for the prevention of disease in asymptomatic communities. OBJECTIVE: To determine the positive predictive value for the BD Veritor System for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 (BD Veritor System) among asymptomatic athletes and athletic staff in a University setting. Secondarily, a cost savings analysis was conducted to evaluate the benefits of a rapid antigen testing strategy over a universal PCR-based strategy. METHODS: Asymptomatic athletic personnel at Ferris State University tested using the BD Veritor System from November 4, 2020-February 15, 2021. Individuals whose antigen test was positive immediately had specimen collected for confirmatory PCR testing. These results were used to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) for the BD Veritor System. A cost-savings analysis was conducted from the University's perspective to determine the value of this rapid antigen testing strategy over a universal PCR-based strategy. RESULTS: A total of 3352 antigen tests were performed on 359 individuals during the study period. During this period, 21 positive antigen tests were obtained of which 5 individuals had a positive reflex PCR result. The calculated PPV of the BD Veritor System among asymptomatic individuals was 25%. According to the mandated athletics testing schedule, the University spent $67,475.76 on BD Veritor System tests and $1785 on confirmatory PCR tests. In contrast, if a solely PCR-based approach had been continued, the same testing strategy would have cost the University $284,920. By employing a 2-tiered testing strategy with the BD Veritor System with reflex PCR testing, the University realized a cost savings of $215,659.24 during the 3-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite sub-optimal PPV associated with the BD Veritor System among asymptomatic athletes, the University was able to effectively use an antigen-based testing program to comply with collegiate testing requirements and realize $215,659.24 cost savings per quarter over a PCR-based strategy.

4.
J Surg Res ; 265: 95-99, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1203194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic drastically reduced learning opportunities for medical students. We sought to determine the cost and success of implementation of a podcast for a surgical department in a large academic hospital. METHODS: We created a podcast series for Israeli medical students during the COVID-19 epidemic based on the Medical Student Core Curriculum of the American College of Surgeons / Association for Surgical Education. Episodes were available for free download or streaming on a designated website and popular podcast platforms. Podcast analytics were used to measure public listeners and uptake. RESULTS: Total development time was 90 hours at an estimated cost of $7091 USD. A total of 10 episodes were released between March 21, 2020 and August 31, 2020. An average of 9 ± 1.26 h (range 2-6) was required to generate each episode, including 3.4 ± 1.26 h (2-6) for content review and 5.6 ± 2 h (4-10) for audio production. An average episode ran for 35.9 ± 4.3 min (28-42). Podcasts recorded a total of 5678 downloads, with an average of 228 and 336 downloads per episode in the first 30 and 90 days, respectively. The average daily downloads before the students returned to clinical rotations (March 21-April 30) was 48 ± 58.3 (7-283;) compared to 16 ± 7.4 after their return (1-38; P< 0.01). Estimated costs to produce a video-based education series would have been significantly more. CONCLUSION: Podcasts can serve as a cost-effective and quickly produced instructional tool to supplement online learning. Further research is required to determine the efficacy of podcasts versus video-based education modules.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Education, Medical , General Surgery/education , SARS-CoV-2 , Webcasts as Topic , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Students, Medical
5.
Infect Dis Model ; 6: 46-55, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-938959

ABSTRACT

Testing for detecting the infection by SARS-CoV-2 is the bridge between the lockdown and the opening of society. In this paper we modelled and simulated a test-trace-and-quarantine strategy to control the COVID-19 outbreak in the State of São Paulo, Brasil. The State of São Paulo failed to adopt an effective social distancing strategy, reaching at most 59% in late March and started to relax the measures in late June, dropping to 41% in 08 August. Therefore, São Paulo relies heavily on a massive testing strategy in the attempt to control the epidemic. Two alternative strategies combined with economic evaluations were simulated. One strategy included indiscriminately testing the entire population of the State, reaching more than 40 million people at a maximum cost of 2.25 billion USD, that would reduce the total number of cases by the end of 2020 by 90%. The second strategy investigated testing only symptomatic cases and their immediate contacts - this strategy reached a maximum cost of 150 million USD but also reduced the number of cases by 90%. The conclusion is that if the State of São Paulo had decided to adopt the simulated strategy on April the 1st, it would have been possible to reduce the total number of cases by 90% at a cost of 2.25 billion US dollars for the indiscriminate strategy but at a much smaller cost of 125 million US dollars for the selective testing of symptomatic cases and their contacts.

6.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 115(4): 469-475, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-740630

ABSTRACT

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic in Northern Italy has slowed down the clinical surgical activity. A system of hub and spoke hospitals was set up to take care of oncological patients with the consequent almost complete abolition of the elective surgical activity for non-oncological pathologies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the surgical volumes of 4 different non academic general hospitals in Lombardy belonging to 4 different provinces. The quarter March April May 2019 was compared with the same period of 2020. All different procedures were listed. The cost analysis was performed using the DRG system. Results: In the four hospitals involved the surgical procedures reduced from 1903 to 350 with a drop of the 81.6%. Procedures for cancer from 403 to 161 with a drop of 60.1%. Procedures for benign disease from 1310 to 118 with a drop of the 91%. Emergencies from 190 to 71 with a drop of the 62.6%. State refund for the procedures performed from 6.708.023 to 1.678.154 with a drop of 75%. Conclusions: Elective surgery was dramatically impaired by the Covid-19 pandemic. Above all procedures for non oncological and non urgent patients were particularly affected. In view of a possible second wave of the pandemic, the surgical planning must select patients not only on onco logical criteria but rather on clinical ones. An ad hoc hub and spoke hospitals pathway has to be implemented for benign surgical diseases by whoever is facing the Covid pandemic at its spike.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , General Surgery/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humans , Italy , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL